Neuromarketing in Hospitality and Gaming: Designing Experience, Shaping Behavior

By Nick Aitoro

Abstract

The hospitality and gaming industry operates in a competitive environment where product differentiation is difficult, and guest loyalty is increasingly fragile. Traditional promotional strategies, while measurable in the short term, have demonstrated limited capacity to build the kind of enduring guest relationships that drive sustained revenue and brand strength. This paper examines neuromarketing principles as a framework for experience design in hospitality and gaming contexts, with particular attention to storytelling as a neurological mechanism for shaping consumer perception, memory, and behavior, and to the frontline workforce as a second, underexamined channel through which that neurological experience is transmitted to guests. Drawing on peer-reviewed literature in neuromarketing, neuroleadership, hospitality management, tourism experience research, and casino marketing effectiveness, this paper argues that storytelling and workforce emotional intelligence together form a unifying framework capable of aligning environmental design, sensory cues, service delivery, and brand identity into a coherent and memorable guest experience. The paper further identifies the organizational, measurement, capability, and cultural barriers that complicate implementation in complex resort operations and proposes evidence-based strategies for overcoming them, including a consultancy-based model for organizations that lack in-house neuroscience expertise. Findings suggest that organizations which align narrative strategy, workforce emotional intelligence, and physical environment are positioned to generate measurable improvements in guest memory formation, revisit intention, and brand equity over time.

Keywords: neuromarketing, storytelling, brand equity, guest experience, hospitality, gaming, consumer behavior, memory formation, tribal gaming, emotional intelligence, neuroleadership, mirror neurons

Problem Statement

The hospitality and gaming industry faces a structural marketing challenge that traditional promotional frameworks have proven insufficient to resolve. Investments in advertising, loyalty programs, and short-cycle promotional activity generate measurable transactional responses but do not reliably produce the emotional engagement, memory encoding, or brand loyalty that sustain long-term guest relationships. Lucas and Bowen (2002) identified this gap specifically within casino environments, demonstrating that conventional promotional metrics frequently fail to capture the actual behavioral impact of marketing investment, creating an institutional bias toward tactics that produce visible short-term numbers at the expense of strategies that build durable guest value.

The problem is compounded by the intangible nature of the hospitality and gaming product itself. Guests are not purchasing a commodity with objectively measurable attributes. They are investing in an experience whose value is determined emotionally, encoded neurologically, and recalled subjectively. Walls et al. (2011) confirmed that the consumer experience in luxury hospitality settings is a layered construct shaped by physical environment, emotional response, and personal meaning-making, none of which are adequately captured by transactional performance metrics alone. When organizations lack a framework for designing and measuring experiential value, they default to promotional activity that addresses surface behavior while leaving the deeper drivers of loyalty unexamined and unmanaged.

A second and less examined dimension of this problem sits inside the organization rather than in front of the guest. Prentice (2016) and de la Nuez et al. (2023) both demonstrate that the emotional state of frontline employees is not incidental to guest experience but a measurable driver of guest evaluative judgments and downstream profitability. Marketing frameworks that focus exclusively on external narrative and environmental design, while ignoring the emotional condition of the workforce delivering the experience, are managing only half of the neurological transmission channel.

This gap between the neurological reality of how guests form preferences and the promotional frameworks most organizations use to influence those preferences represents the central problem this paper addresses. In tribal gaming environments, this gap carries additional weight. Organizations rooted in indigenous cultural identity possess a narrative resource of depth and authenticity that no competitor can replicate. When that resource remains unconnected to experience design, workforce culture, and marketing strategy, the loss is not merely competitive. It is a failure to use what is most distinctive about the organization to build the emotional connection guests are neurologically primed to form.

Research Questions

This paper is guided by the following research questions:

How do neuromarketing principles, particularly those related to storytelling, sensory design, and memory formation, inform experience design in hospitality and gaming environments?

What is the relationship between narrative-driven marketing, brand equity, and guest purchasing and revisitation behavior?

What role does frontline employee emotional intelligence play in the neurological transmission of brand experience to guests, and how does this relate to storytelling as an external narrative channel?

What barriers exist to the implementation of storytelling-based and emotionally intelligent experience design in complex resort operations, and what strategies are most effective in overcoming them?

Methodology

This paper employs a qualitative, integrative literature review methodology, synthesizing existing peer-reviewed research across five intersecting domains: neuromarketing and consumer neuroscience, neuroleadership and workplace emotional intelligence, hospitality and luxury hotel experience research, tourism memory and behavior, and casino marketing effectiveness. Building a conceptual framework applicable to practice, rather than testing a specific hypothesis within a single organizational context, is better served by synthesis across domains than by primary empirical data collection.

Sources were selected based on relevance to the intersection of neurological consumer behavior and hospitality and gaming management. The Çitaku (2023) neuromarketing text provides the foundational scientific framework, supplemented by Gurgu et al. (2020) on the applied tools and mechanisms of neuromarketing. Rizkia and Oktafani (2020) contribute empirical quantitative findings on the relationship between storytelling marketing, brand equity, and purchasing decisions. Walls et al. (2011) ground the discussion in hospitality-specific consumer experience research. Prentice (2016) and de la Nuez et al. (2023) supply the workforce emotional intelligence and neuroleadership evidence base, and Rizzolatti and Craighero (2004) provide the underlying neuroscience of the mirror-neuron system that connects staff affect to guest experience. Kim et al. (2012) provide a validated framework for understanding and measuring memorable tourism experiences. Lucas and Bowen (2002) supply casino-specific evidence regarding the limitations of traditional promotional measurement.

The synthesis of these sources is organized around the paper’s four research questions and proceeds through a structured literature review, results interpretation, and applied discussion grounded in the operational realities of a tribal gaming and hospitality environment.

Literature Review

Neuromarketing and Consumer Behavior

Neuromarketing applies neuroscientific methods and findings to the study of consumer behavior, examining how sensory stimuli, emotional engagement, and subconscious processing shape perception and decision-making. Çitaku (2023) provides a comprehensive framework establishing that consumer responses to marketing stimuli are primarily subconscious, occurring through neurological pathways that process emotional and sensory information before conscious evaluation takes place. Color, shape, texture, spatial layout, and narrative structure each activate distinct areas of the brain, triggering emotional and physiological responses that influence how individuals perceive value, quality, and identity.

Gurgu et al. (2020) corroborate this subconscious-processing framework from an applied measurement perspective, describing how tools such as functional magnetic resonance imaging, eye-tracking, and electroencephalography allow marketers to observe implicit and automatic consumer responses that self-report methods cannot reliably capture. Their central finding, that neuromarketing exists to decode consumer needs and emotions that consumers themselves cannot fully articulate, reinforces why promotional strategies built solely on stated preference or short-cycle conversion metrics systematically miss the deeper drivers of guest behavior.

Of particular relevance is Çitaku’s (2023) treatment of storytelling as a neurological phenomenon. When individuals engage with a compelling narrative, multiple regions of the brain activate simultaneously, including areas associated with sensory experience, motor response, emotion, and memory. This neural activation mirrors the experience described in the story, creating a form of embodied engagement that linear or analytical communication cannot replicate. The result is deeper memory encoding, stronger emotional association, and greater likelihood of behavioral influence over time.

Storytelling, Brand Equity, and Purchasing Behavior

Rizkia and Oktafani (2020) examined the relationship between storytelling marketing, brand equity, and purchasing decisions in the context of Gojek, a technology-based rideshare platform operating in Jakarta, Indonesia. Using a quantitative Partial Least Squares analytical framework, the study found statistically significant relationships between storytelling marketing and brand equity, between brand equity and purchasing decisions, and between storytelling marketing and purchasing decisions both directly and through brand equity as an intervening variable.

While the organizational and cultural context of a Jakarta rideshare platform differs substantially from a tribal gaming resort in the Pacific Northwest, the neurological mechanism at the center of these findings is not context-dependent. Çitaku (2023) establishes that the brain’s narrative processing pathways are consistent across individuals and environments; the story changes, but the neuroscience through which it operates does not. The relationship between narrative engagement, brand perception, and behavioral decision-making reflects how human memory and emotional processing function across contexts. What changes between environments is the medium through which the story is delivered and the sensory and cultural conditions in which it is received.

The Consumer Experience in Hospitality Settings

Walls et al. (2011) conducted an exploratory study of consumer experience in luxury hotel environments, finding that the guest experience is not a discrete event but a dynamic, co-created construct shaped by the interaction between physical environment, service encounters, emotional states, and personal meaning. The physical environment was identified as a particularly powerful determinant of perceived quality and value, operating largely at a subconscious level before any direct service interaction occurs. This finding aligns with Çitaku’s (2023) neuromarketing framework, in which environmental stimuli such as color, light, spatial configuration, and texture function as pre-conscious signals that shape the emotional register guests bring to every subsequent interaction.

The co-creative dimension of the Walls et al. (2011) framework carries important implications for marketing strategy. If experience emerges through the interaction between organizational design and guest meaning-making, then marketing cannot operate solely as a communication function. It must extend into the design of every environment and encounter the guest touches, ensuring that each element reinforces rather than contradicts the narrative the brand is attempting to build.

Emotional Intelligence, Mirror Neurons, and Frontline Service as a Neurological Transmission Channel

A guest’s experience of a property is shaped not only by environment and narrative but by direct human interaction, and the neuroscience of that interaction has an identifiable mechanism. Rizzolatti and Craighero (2004) established the existence of the mirror-neuron system, a network of neurons that activate both when an individual performs an action or experiences an emotion and when that individual observes another person doing the same. In practical terms, guests do not merely observe the emotional state of a frontline employee. They neurologically simulate it. A dealer, server, or front desk agent who is genuinely calm and engaged does not simply appear welcoming; they produce a corresponding neurological state in the guest that shapes how the entire subsequent interaction is encoded in memory.

This mechanism gives empirical weight to two hospitality-specific findings. Prentice (2016) found that casino service encounters function as emotional events, and that the emotional intelligence of frontline employees is directly related to casino profitability through its effect on guest retention. De la Nuez et al. (2023), studying a hotel tourism chain over a six-month period, found that affective events in the workplace significantly improve employees’ evaluative judgments of their organization, and identified neuroleadership skills, the capacity of managers to understand and intentionally shape workplace emotion, as a meaningful lever for improving both employee wellbeing and downstream service quality.

Read together with Rizzolatti and Craighero (2004), these findings reframe workforce emotional intelligence from a human resources concern into a second neurological transmission channel operating alongside storytelling. Storytelling shapes the narrative a guest brings into an interaction. The emotional state of the staff member delivering that interaction shapes what the guest’s brain does in the moment of contact. An organization can build a resonant external narrative and still fail to produce a coherent guest experience if the internal emotional climate contradicts that narrative at the point of delivery.

Memory Formation and Repeat Behavior in Tourism

Kim et al. (2012) developed and validated a scale for measuring memorable tourism experiences, identifying seven core dimensions: hedonism, refreshment, local culture, meaningfulness, knowledge, involvement, and novelty. Their research established that experiences scoring highly across these dimensions are significantly more likely to produce satisfaction, revisit intention, and positive word-of-mouth behavior. Critically, the memorability of an experience was found to be a stronger predictor of future behavior than satisfaction alone, suggesting that the emotional and cognitive depth of the experience, rather than simply whether it met expectations, determines its long-term behavioral impact.

This finding has direct implications for how hospitality and gaming organizations should think about marketing investment. If memorability drives revisitation more powerfully than satisfaction, then strategies oriented primarily toward service quality maintenance, while necessary, are insufficient. Organizations must also invest in the dimensions that produce memorable experiences, including the hedonic, cultural, and meaningfulness dimensions that storytelling and emotionally intelligent service are positioned to generate.

Measurement Limitations in Casino Marketing

Lucas and Bowen (2002) examined the effectiveness of casino promotional strategies, finding that the metrics most commonly used to evaluate promotional performance in casino environments are poorly suited to capturing the actual behavioral impact of marketing investment. Traditional measures such as rated play, theoretical win, and promotional redemption rates reflect transactional activity but do not account for the long-term behavioral changes, brand associations, and loyalty trajectories that determine the sustained value of a marketing strategy. The consequence is an institutional preference for promotions that generate measurable short-cycle responses over investments in experience design and narrative development that produce behavioral change over longer time horizons.

This measurement gap is not merely a technical limitation. It shapes organizational culture and resource allocation in ways that systematically underinvest in the strategies most likely to produce durable competitive advantage. When success is defined primarily through short-term metrics such as immediate revenue, conversion rates, or quarterly performance, the organization naturally prioritizes tactics that deliver quick, visible returns. In that environment, strategies like storytelling, workforce emotional intelligence development, and brand building are often viewed as secondary or discretionary, despite their long-term impact on loyalty, retention, and lifetime value.

This dynamic becomes even more pronounced at the governance level. Securing alignment from a board or council can be challenging when the expected return is not immediate or easily quantified. Leadership bodies are often tasked with fiduciary oversight and risk management, which tends to favor short-term gains that can be clearly measured and reported. The result is a tension between operational performance and strategic investment. The very initiatives that build long-term brand equity and emotional connection with guests are the ones most difficult to justify in traditional financial terms.

What is required is not a shift away from performance accountability, but a more balanced framework for evaluating success. Short-term results matter. They sustain operations, fund growth, and provide necessary feedback. However, without a parallel commitment to long-term brand development, organizations risk optimizing for transactions at the expense of relationships. In hospitality and gaming, where differentiation is rooted in experience and emotional resonance, that trade-off becomes particularly costly over time.

The path forward is to establish a dual-lens approach. One lens remains focused on immediate operational performance, ensuring the business remains efficient and competitive in the short term. The second lens is anchored in long-term value creation, with an emphasis on building emotional connection, brand trust, and memorability. These elements do not always show up in the next quarter, but they compound over time in the form of repeat visitation, increased spend per guest, and sustained loyalty.

For boards and councils, the conversation has to evolve from “short-term versus long-term” to “short-term in service of long-term.” The underlying thread that connects both is the intentional design of emotional connection. Every operational decision, every marketing initiative, and every guest interaction should reinforce that connection. When that alignment is achieved, short-term performance and long-term brand equity are no longer competing priorities. They become mutually reinforcing outcomes of the same strategic intent.

Results

The synthesis of the literature across these six domains produces several converging findings relevant to the application of neuromarketing principles in hospitality and gaming environments.

First, consumer behavior in hospitality and gaming is driven primarily by subconscious emotional and neurological processes rather than rational evaluation. Guests form perceptions of value, quality, and identity through sensory and emotional experience before conscious assessment occurs. This means that the environment, the narrative, and the emotional register of every guest interaction carry more behavioral weight than the informational content of any marketing message.

Second, storytelling functions as a neurological mechanism that activates deeper memory encoding, stronger emotional association, and more durable brand equity than conventional promotional communication. The empirical evidence from Rizkia and Oktafani (2020) confirms the direct and indirect pathways through which storytelling influences purchasing behavior, with brand equity functioning as the mediating construct that amplifies storytelling’s long-term impact.

Third, physical environment is not a background condition of the guest experience but an active and primary determinant of perceived quality and emotional engagement. The alignment between narrative strategy and environmental design is therefore a prerequisite for storytelling effectiveness rather than a secondary consideration.

Fourth, frontline workforce emotional intelligence operates as a second, independent neurological transmission channel. Through the mirror-neuron mechanism described by Rizzolatti and Craighero (2004), guests neurologically simulate the emotional states of the staff who serve them. Prentice (2016) and de la Nuez et al. (2023) confirm that this channel has measurable downstream effects on guest evaluative judgment and casino profitability, meaning that workforce emotional climate is not a support function adjacent to marketing but an operational component of it.

Fifth, memorable experiences, as defined by Kim et al. (2012) across seven validated dimensions, are stronger predictors of revisitation and word-of-mouth behavior than satisfaction alone. This positions experience design, encompassing both external narrative and internal service culture, as a core driver of long-term marketing performance rather than a purely hospitality function.

Sixth, the measurement frameworks most commonly used in casino environments are structurally biased against the strategies most likely to produce durable guest loyalty. This creates an organizational condition in which the right strategies, including both storytelling investment and workforce emotional intelligence development, are systematically underfunded relative to strategies that are easier to measure but less effective over time.

Discussion

Storytelling as the Unifying External Framework

The most significant implication of the synthesized literature is that storytelling is not one marketing tactic among many. It is the framework capable of aligning every external element of the guest experience into a coherent and memorable whole. Environmental design, sensory cues, service standards, and brand communication each influence guest perception independently. Storytelling is what gives those elements shared meaning. It transforms individual touchpoints into a connected arc that guests experience as purposeful rather than incidental.

The practical entry point for implementation is character-driven narrative tied directly to the guest experience. Narratives centered on people, whether guests, team members, or the community figures who give the property its cultural identity, generate the kind of trust and connection that Çitaku (2023) identifies as central to brand loyalty formation. In a tribal gaming context, the cultural history, values, and community identity of the owning tribe represent a narrative resource of extraordinary depth and authenticity. This is not a marketing asset to be deployed strategically. It is the story from which all other storytelling should extend. When told with integrity and consistency, it produces a form of brand equity that no competitor can replicate because it belongs to no one else.

Emotional Intelligence as the Internal Storyline

If storytelling is the external narrative a guest brings into an interaction, workforce emotional intelligence is the internal narrative that gets delivered in the moment of contact, and the mirror-neuron mechanism means these two channels cannot be managed independently without risk. A property that invests heavily in an authentic, well-told brand story while underinvesting in the emotional condition of its frontline workforce is building half of a coherent guest experience. Every interaction with an emotionally dysregulated, disengaged, or exhausted employee is a neurological signal that competes with, and can override, the external narrative the organization has spent resources building.

This reframes several traditional human resources functions as marketing infrastructure. Hiring practices that screen for emotional intelligence, management training grounded in the neuroleadership principles described by de la Nuez et al. (2023), and workload structures that protect frontline employees from the kind of chronic stress that degrades affective regulation are not adjacent to brand strategy. They are a direct input into what a guest’s brain actually experiences during service delivery. Prentice’s (2016) finding that this relationship shows up in casino profitability data suggests the effect is not merely theoretical but measurable in the same financial terms boards already use to evaluate marketing investment.

Environmental Alignment as a Prerequisite

The literature consistently identifies the physical environment as a primary determinant of guest perception and emotional engagement. For storytelling to function as intended, the environment must speak the same language as the narrative. A compelling brand story delivered through marketing communications but contradicted by the physical reality of the guest environment does not simply underperform. It generates a trust violation that is neurologically encoded more durably than the positive narrative it was intended to create. Çitaku (2023) notes that the brain assigns heightened salience to experiences that violate established expectations, encoding them with greater emotional intensity as a protective mechanism. Incongruence between narrative promise and environmental reality activates exactly this response, making the gap itself the most memorable aspect of the guest experience. This means that investment in storytelling strategy must be accompanied by investment in environmental coherence, ensuring that spatial design, sensory elements, and transitional spaces all reinforce the narrative the organization is building, and by investment in the workforce delivering that narrative in person.

Reframing the Measurement Problem

The measurement gap identified by Lucas and Bowen (2002) is among the most consequential barriers to effective implementation. Without measurement frameworks that can capture the behavioral and perceptual outcomes storytelling and workforce emotional intelligence are designed to produce, organizations will continue to underinvest in both relative to promotional tactics. Addressing this requires building a complementary measurement infrastructure that tracks guest sentiment, emotional engagement, repeat visitation patterns, and qualitative brand association alongside traditional revenue metrics. The seven memorable experience dimensions identified by Kim et al. (2012), including involvement, novelty, meaningfulness, and local culture, provide a validated conceptual basis for developing such instruments, and could be paired with the kind of employee affective-event tracking used by de la Nuez et al. (2023) to give leadership a two-sided view of the guest experience pipeline, from internal workforce climate through to external guest perception. A guest and employee research program built around these dimensions would give organizational leadership a credible evidence base for sustaining investment in experience design through short-term performance fluctuations.

Organizational and Cultural Conditions for Success

The literature points to organizational alignment as a prerequisite for storytelling effectiveness that is as important as the quality of the narrative itself. In a complex resort operation, the story is delivered through every department simultaneously. If facilities, food and beverage, gaming operations, and hotel services are not operating from a shared understanding of the narrative the organization is building, and if frontline emotional climate varies unpredictably by department, the guest experience becomes fragmented, and the neurological coherence that makes storytelling powerful is lost. This requires narrative ownership at a level of organizational authority that crosses departmental lines, supported by training programs, service standards, and internal communication that consistently reinforce the story from the inside out.

Three barriers most commonly complicate this work in practice, and each has a distinct strategic response. The first is cost. Environmental redesign, narrative development, and workforce emotional intelligence training all carry upfront expense that is difficult to justify against the measurement gap described above. The most durable response is a phased pilot model: a single department, property zone, or guest touchpoint is used to generate the kind of qualitative and behavioral evidence described in the measurement discussion, which then becomes the internal business case for broader investment.

The second barrier is interpretation complexity. Neuromarketing and neuroleadership are specialized fields, and most hospitality and gaming organizations, including most tribal gaming enterprises, will not have in-house neuroscience expertise, nor is hiring a full-time neuroscientist a realistic option for the majority of properties. The practical response is a consultancy or fractional-specialist model, in which an organization engages neuromarketing and organizational-psychology consultants on a project or retainer basis to design measurement instruments, interpret findings, and train internal staff, rather than attempting to build permanent in-house capability that the organization’s scale does not justify.

The third barrier is cultural resistance, which is predictable in environments where efficiency and short-cycle performance are the dominant values. The most durable response to this resistance is not a broad transformation initiative but a disciplined series of focused demonstrations that show what story-aligned, emotionally intelligent experience design produces in measurable guest behavior. Evidence builds momentum in ways that vision alone cannot sustain.

Conclusion

This paper has argued that neuromarketing principles, storytelling chief among them, offer hospitality and gaming organizations a more effective and neurologically grounded framework for influencing guest behavior than traditional promotional strategies, and that this framework is incomplete without attention to the emotional intelligence of the frontline workforce delivering the experience. The literature converges on the finding that consumer behavior in this industry is driven by emotion, memory, and subconscious experience design rather than rational evaluation of promotional offers. Storytelling activates the neurological pathways through which memory is encoded, trust is formed, and loyalty is built. The mirror-neuron mechanism means that workforce emotional state activates a parallel and equally consequential set of pathways in the guest’s brain. When narrative strategy, physical environment, and workforce emotional climate are aligned, the result is a form of brand equity that is both durable and distinctive.

The barriers to implementation are real and organizationally specific. Fragmented departmental structures, inadequate measurement frameworks, limited internal capability, and cultural resistance to long-arc investment all complicate the shift from transactional to experiential marketing. Each of these barriers has a strategic response grounded in the literature: phased pilots to address cost, a consultancy-based model to address interpretation complexity, and focused, evidence-generating demonstrations to address cultural resistance. The organizations most likely to succeed are those that approach the transition with discipline, invest in the internal emotional climate of their workforce alongside their external narrative, build measurement systems that can capture experiential value, and ground their story in the authentic cultural identity that makes it genuinely irreplaceable.

In an industry where every property competes for the same guest attention, the ability to design how guests feel and what they remember, both through what is told and through who tells it, is not a marketing advantage. It is the foundation of the entire guest relationship.

References

Çitaku, F. (2023). Neuromarketing: A simplified guide with scientific foundations, practical tips, and ethical insights for successful product selling and brand development. Academy of Leadership Sciences Switzerland.

de la Nuez, H., Nieves, J., & Osorio, J. (2023). Neuroleadership: Affective experiences in the workplace and their influence on employees’ evaluative judgements. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 114, 103554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103554

Gurgu, E., Gurgu, I.-A., & Tonis, R. B. M. (2020). Neuromarketing for a better understanding of consumer needs and emotions. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 11(1), 208–235. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i1.993

Kim, J. H., Ritchie, J. R. B., & McCormick, B. (2012). Development of a scale to measure memorable tourism experiences. Journal of Travel Research, 51(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287510385467

Lucas, A. F., & Bowen, J. T. (2002). Measuring the effectiveness of casino promotions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 21(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4319(02)00004-X

Prentice, C. (2016). Leveraging employee emotional intelligence in casino profitability. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 33, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.011

Rizkia, R., & Oktafani, F. (2020). The effect of storytelling marketing on purchasing decisions through brand equity as an intervening variable on Gojek in Jakarta. International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities, 3(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijmesh.v3i1.190

Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230

Walls, A., Okumus, F., Wang, Y., & Kwun, D. J. (2011). Understanding the consumer experience: An exploratory study of luxury hotels. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 20(2), 166–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2011.536074onsumer experience: An exploratory study of luxury hotels. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 20(1), 166–197.